The Ontario Court of Appeal's decision in Van Decker Estate v Van Decker , 2022 ONCA 712 serves as a reminder that not every type of eviction case is restricted to a hearing in the Landlord and Tenant Board ("LTB"). In that case, an estate trustee brought a motion for directions after one of the estate's beneficiaries and his spouse refused to vacate a property the deceased owned at the time of his death. The motions judge had granted the estate trustee's request for an order declaring that the property's occupants were not tenants of and had no interest in the property, that they vacate the property, and that they pay occupation rent arrears at fair market value to the estate. Although not framed in this way, the estate trustee essentially sought what is commonly referred to as an order for vacant possession of the house. At first glance, it may seem as though the LTB should have determined the issues in this case, but the Superior Court of Justice has juri...
Last week, GSPC lawyer Daniel Mauer commented on the case of a fallen tree in St. Catharines. The segment, which aired on September 11, 2020, can be found on the CHCH website . This case brings forward some important considerations with respect to municipal liability and insurance generally. Notice under the Municipal Act It is important to remember when suing an Ontario municipality that a potential claimant must provide the municipality with notice of a claim arising out of any alleged failure to properly maintain a municipal highway or bridge within 10 days of the damage or injury occurring. Section 44 of the Municipal Act, 2001 sets out the requirements for such notice. While a party who fails to give notice within the 10-day period may apply to the court for relief from compliance, it is advisable to provide the proper notice to avoid potential issues in any ensuing litigation. Insurance Regardless of whether you have a negligence claim, it is always advisable to...